Risk
Management for Organic Dairies
Organic Dairying: Can It Work for
You?
Bulletin
#1023
Developed by
Extension Professor Richard Kersbergen, University of Maine
Cooperative Extension
The market for
organic milk
The current market for organic
dairy products has grown by more than 15 percent per year over
the last five years. Organic dairy sales reached $2.14 billion
in 2005 and represented 15 percent of total organic retail food
sales (OTA 2006). In the northeastern United States, organic
dairy production has become one of the fastest growing sectors
in agriculture. In this region producers are currently receiving
between $28/cwt and $30/cwt. Since organic milk is a specialized
product in the marketplace and in high demand, processors and
distributors can command a significantly higher price: retail
prices across the country for organic milk are double the prices
of conventional milk. Other incentives for producers to
transition to organic production include a stable contracted
price for organic milk, as well as the absence of transportation
costs for shipment of organic milk to the processor.
Costs of
organic production
Organic dairy production
practices include several significant differences from
conventional production that increase the cost of producing
organic milk. Standards include feeding 100 percent organically
produced feed (for both forage and concentrate) and providing
access to and use of pasture during the growing season. Other
conventional production methods not allowed in organic systems
include the use of antibiotics and hormones, such as those used
in synchronization of cows and heifers. Currently vaccines are
allowed.
Getting
through the transition period
A major stumbling block for many
producers who are considering organic production is the
transition period for the land and animals. For cropland,
pesticides and inorganic fertilizers cannot be used for 36
months prior to certification. Transitioning a herd of cows
requires that the animals on the farm be managed organically for
12 months before the milk is considered organic. Once a herd has
transitioned, all heifers and young stock on the farm must be
raised organically from the last third of gestation onward.
This transition process for cows
and heifers can be costly, since organic feed costs are
significantly higher but the milk produced must still be sold on
the conventional market while the herd transitions. Processors
and buyers are providing transition payments, as well as
“signing bonuses," to producers who sign contracts to encourage
adoption of organic practices. Some states, including Vermont
and New York, have initiated programs to provide additional
incentives for producers who want to transition, because state
agricultural officials see organic dairy production as a way to
sustain the family farm. Many of the processors also provide
technical assistance as well as sources of supplies and grain to
transitioning farmers.
The current
state of the organic dairy industry
So what do organic dairy farms in
the U.S. look like? Data from a survey conducted in Maine in
2003 indicated that most of the 60 Maine producers transitioned
to organic dairy farming for financial reasons. Most felt that
the higher premium paid to organic farmers would be sufficient
to cover the increased costs of production and provide a
positive return on their assets. Many of these farms were
considering leaving the dairy industry and wanted to “give
organic a try” before they made the decision to quit farming.
Most of these farms transitioned in the late 1990s or early in
this century. At that time, milk prices were about $20.86/cwt,
and production costs were estimated to be $18.00/cwt (McCrory
2000).
The organic dairy farm is
characterized as being small, with a 48-cow average in Maine and
Vermont, and a 65-cow average in Wisconsin (Barham et al. 2006).
Organic production per cow in both regions—40 lb per cow per day
in the Northeast and 52 lb per cow per day in Wisconsin—tends to
be less than conventional farms of similar sizes.
Data from New
England research
More recently, a comprehensive
study by researchers at the University of Maine and the
University of Vermont looked at demographic, management, and
financial performance data from 30 farms in 2004 and 44 farms in
2005. Data from these studies is presented in Tables 1-3.
|
Table 1.
Organic milk production and sales data from 44 farms
in 2005 |
| |
Average |
Lowest |
Highest |
| Cows per farm |
56 |
22 |
184 |
| Milk produced
(lb/farm) |
740,098 |
197,000 |
2,357,600 |
| Milk marketed
(lb/cow) |
12,619 |
6,115 |
19,508 |
| Milk price ($/cwt) |
24.94 |
22.38 |
30.95 |
| Milk revenue
($/year) |
184,144 |
49,981 |
588,091 |
All organic producers rely on
their pastures as an important source of forage during the
grazing season. Seventy-three percent of producers move their
milking herds onto fresh pastures at least every day and more
than half of the producers in each of the profit tiers move
their herds to fresh pastures twice a day. On average, organic
producers met 88 percent of their herd’s annual forage needs
with hay, haylage, silage, or greenchop grown on the farm. In
addition to the forage ration, each milking cow received 12 lb
of grain daily in the summer and 14.5 lb of grain in the winter,
on average. Similar practices are noted among farms in different
profit levels. It should be noted that farms in Maine and
Vermont do not grow much, if any, of their own grain
concentrate; almost all is purchased from sources throughout the
U.S. and Canada.
|
Table 2.
Effect of herd nutrition and health costs on profit
levels |
| |
Profit levels |
| |
Low |
Middle |
High |
Average |
| Amount
of purchased forage (%) |
12 |
6 |
18 |
12 |
| Grain
(lb/cow/day) |
|
|
|
|
| |
Summer |
11 |
11.79 |
12.4 |
12 |
| |
Winter |
13.67 |
14.6 |
15.9 |
14.5 |
|
Veterinary visits (farm/year) |
11 |
11 |
10 |
10.4 |
Annual amount of milk shipped
ranges from approximately 197,000 lb to 2,357,600 lb on organic
farms, averaging 740,098 lb in 2005. The average milk shipped
per cow was 12,619 lb.
|
Table 3.
Average Income and Expenses for 44 farms in Maine and
Vermont in 2005 |
|
Expenses |
Cost ($/cow) |
|
Auto expenses
|
43.16 |
|
Bedding |
64.48 |
|
Breeding |
45.98 |
|
Chemicals |
1.35 |
|
Custom hire |
72.70 |
|
DHIA* |
13.26 |
|
Fertilizers |
19.18 |
|
Purchased feed |
936.09 |
|
Fuel and oil |
104.42 |
|
Insurance |
72.00 |
|
Interest |
124.29 |
|
Hired labor |
338.21 |
|
Marketing |
51.42 |
|
Taxes |
62.47 |
|
Rent |
47.07 |
|
Repairs |
216.27 |
|
Seeds |
13.51 |
|
Supplies |
183.89 |
|
Utilities |
125.93 |
|
Veterinary services |
39.38 |
|
Medicinal supplies |
6.31 |
|
Miscellaneous |
60.75 |
|
Total cash expense
|
2,642.12 |
|
Total milk revenue |
3,134.00 |
|
Net income for farm
family labor and management and debt service |
491.88 |
|
*Dairy Herd Improvement
Association |
Milk prices
in 2006 and 2007 reached
simulated need
When trying to predict costs and
returns to farms for 2006 and 2007, researchers simulated costs
that would include higher fuel and purchased feed costs than
they actually anticipated. Based on these simulations, they
concluded that producers would need to receive about $27/cwt of
milk to see a positive return on equity and assets. This is the
price that producers in the region are now receiving.
Challenges in
organic management practices
Several factors have changed how
organic dairy farms manage their cows. First, since purchased
organic grains are extremely expensive—often double the price of
conventional sources of concentrate—producers reduce the amount
they feed. Quality, availability, and consistency of supply and
quality are also issues when sourcing organic grains. As seen in
Table 1, producers in the Northeast feed between 11 and 15.5 lb
of grain to their cows to supplement forage and pasture. This is
significantly lower than conventional farms.
In addition to the cost of the
grain, producers must consider the challenges of disease and
stress in cows that are fed for maximum production. Most of the
producers choose an artificial limit of 30 percent concentrate
in the diet. By doing so, they have also decided to breed their
cows differently, including crossbreeding: organic farmers are
choosing breeds that may produce lower volumes of milk, but may
be better converters of forage to milk and can better withstand
a negative energy balance in early lactation.
Another potential challenge is
that the National Organic Program is considering a stricter
interpretation of pasture rules and heifer raising practices in
organic production systems. These changes may affect how current
organic farms produce organic milk and may also change the
national market.
Achievement of significant
profits in an organic dairy requires a knowledgeable operator
who can effectively manage pasture systems, harvest high-quality
forage to reduce the need for purchased concentrates, and
practice preventative health care for the herd.
Organic dairy
shows promise
Currently organic production,
with its significantly higher milk premiums, seems to be
providing an economically viable alternative that can help small
producers stay in business. Researchers in Wisconsin also found
that the switch to organic production has given rise to dairy
farmers who are far more satisfied with their income and quality
of life. Compared to their conventional counterparts, organic
dairy farmers in Wisconsin were more optimistic about the future
viability of their operations (Barham et al. 2006). Maine and
Vermont researchers reported that 85 percent of the farms in
their study were very satisfied with their decision to produce
for the organic market; none were dissatisfied.
For more
information
Barham, Bradford L., Caroline
Brock, and Jeremy Foltz, 2006.
PATS Research Report No.16—Organic Dairy Farms in Wisconsin:
Prosperous, Modern, and Expansive
(www.pats.wisc.edu/pdf
documents/Organic_Dairy_Farms_in_Wisconsin_6_16_06 with
executive summary and front cover2.pdf). Madison, WI:
Program on Agricultural Technology Studies. (accessed 3
January 2007).
Dalton, Timothy J., Lisa A.
Bragg, Rick Kersbergen, Robert Parsons, Glen Rogers, Dennis
Kauppila, and Qingbin Wang, 2005. University of Maine
Department of Resource Economics and Policy Staff Paper
#555—Cost and Returns to Organic Dairy Farming in Maine and
Vermont for 2004. Orono, ME: University of Maine
Department of Resource Economics and Policy.
McCrory, Lisa, 2001.
An Economic Comparison of Organic and Conventional Dairy
Production, and Estimations on the Cost of Transitioning to
Organic Production
(www.nofavt.org/programs/dairy-technical-resources/economic_comparison_organic_conventional_dairy.pdf). Richmond, VT: Northeast Organic
Farming Association of Vermont’s Dairy Technical Assistance
Program. (accessed September 2007).
Organic Trade Association
(OTA),
2006.
The Organic Trade Association 2006 Manufacturer Survey
(www.ota.com/pics/documents/short
overview MMS.pdf).
Greenfield, MA: Organic Trade Association. (accessed 14
December 2006).
1
cwt:
hundredweight
This publication is sponsored by the
Northeast Center for Risk Management
Education under USDA/CSREES award #2004-49200-02254.
©
2007